Patient
Perceptions of Eye Disease and Treatment in Bihar India
M. Brayden
Lundquist*, Nishant Sharma°, Kirti Kewalramani
*Bachelor of Science
from the University of Utah
°Bachelor of
Science from the University of Saskatchewan
Preventable blindness is an important issue in public health for
developing nations around the world, especially in India.1
Estimations of blindness in India by the World Health Organization (WHO) show
11.2% of the population suffering from preventable blindness with more than 2 million
new cases expected each year.2 With the second largest population
after China, India’s eye care professionals are overwhelmed with an
astronomical number of patients. Nearly 70% of India’s population resides in
rural areas, and only 10,000 ophthalmologists are responsible for the care of
the entire population —a ratio of 1 ophthalmologist per 100,000 people.3
Cataracts plague the world with over 17 million cases.4 The
Indian population accounts for 1 of every 3 cases worldwide. Most of the
patients suffering from cataracts are found in rural villages where money and
education are scarce. Studies show that almost 30% of persons living in rural
areas of India have never sought care from any kind of health care facility.5
Many efforts have been made to provide free services to patients in these rural
communities. As many as 70% of participants in a rural study of southern India
reported an awareness of cataracts, and in the same study only 15% of
participants knew what a cataract was and how it is treated.6
Additionally health illiteracy among India’s population is problematic,
leading to residents who are not aware of prevalent eye diseases and possible
treatments. Currently, India’s adult literacy rate is 64.2%.7 In an effort to address
the nation’s untreated eye conditions, the WHO and the International Agency for
Prevention of Blindness (IAPB) partnered with the Indian government to create
India’s VISION 2020: Right to Sight.8 In this initiative, seven
focus areas are identified: cataracts, childhood blindness, refractive errors
and low vision, corneal blindness, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy.9 With
this in mind, we developed a qualitative survey to get an initial picture of
Patna city and rural resident’s knowledge of prevalent eye diseases and
treatments.
Methods
The present study was developed in collaboration with Unite for Sight,
an American Non-Governmental Organization that supports local eye doctors in
developing countries, and their partner clinic the A. B. Eye Institute, in
Patna India. The communities identified in the outreach efforts of the A. B.
Eye Institute served as an initial assessment of patient’s baseline knowledge
of eye conditions and possible treatment methods to aid in the future
development of educational outreach initiatives and studies. The survey was
administered to 304 participants verbally with the help of native speakers and
translators from March to September 2010. A convenience sample was used
from the A B Eye Institute in Patna and its rural satellite clinics with
patients aged 40 and older. Research has concluded that 90% of blindness occurs
within this age group.1 Questions were based on prior research,
including the focus areas in India’s VISION 2020 initiatives, the A. B. Eye
Institute, its patients, and the socio-economics of Patna. Multiple
choice survey questions were translated into Hindi and read verbatim by native
speakers. Verbal responses from participants were recorded by hand. Ethics
review was received through the Institutional Review Board at the University of
Utah. Study data was analyzed using PASW Statistics 18.0 software.

Results
Surveys were administered to 304 subjects aged 40 and older (56.1% male,
43.9% female). The mean age of the participants was 53.89 (± 10.851) years,
with 61.3% living on 100 rupees or less per day. Previous eye doctor visits
were reported by 68.3% of subjects. 25.7% of subjects reported using eye drops
prescribed by someone other than a doctor, and of those, 52.6% reported not
knowing that a doctor should prescribe eye drops (Figure 1). 71.9% of subjects
accurately reported that a cataract is treated by surgery, while 23.4% did not
know. Of those aware of cataract treatment, 41.9% learned about treatment from
an eye care professional, and 36.4% from someone with a cataract (Figure 2).
17.1% of participants reported diabetic diagnosis by a doctor, and of those,
64.7% inaccurately reported how often diabetics should receive eye exams
(Figure 3). Furthermore, 60.3% of patients reported no awareness of the
condition glaucoma and 80.9% did not know that blurry vision caused by glaucoma
is irreversible.
Interpretation
Prescription Eye Drop Usage
There is limited research on the topic of eye drop usage in India. Due
to cases of ocular damage from incorrectly prescribed eye drops resulting from
misdiagnosis and treatment by village practitioners and shopkeepers, A. B. Eye
Institute ophthalmologists suggested this topic be addressed. Roughly
one quarter of the study participants (25.7%) reported using eye drops
prescribed by someone other than an eye doctor. Our study found that 52.6% of
participants did not know that an eye doctor should prescribe eye drops. This
data suggests that both the rural population as well as the rural practitioners
would benefit from educational outreach regarding correct diagnosis and
corresponding prescription eye drop treatment. Specific questions for future
study exploration may include: patient awareness of eye care
specialists/specialties and incidence or prevention of irreversible eye damage
due to improper eye drop usage.
Diabetes
The progression of diabetes can lead to many systemic complications, including
diabetic retinopathy. In our study, 17.1 % of participants had a confirmed
diagnosis of diabetes, and of those, 64.7% inaccurately reported how often
diabetics should receive an eye exam. Rani et al. conducted a study in Tamil
Nadu (south India) examining awareness about diabetic retinopathy and found
that one third of the participants with a confirmed diagnoses of diabetes were
under the impression that adequate glycemic control was sufficient enough to
avoid consultations by an ophthalmologist.10 The study also found a
positive correlation between education, socioecomic status and awareness
regarding vision impairment due to diabetes. Because of the stratified nature
of Indian society, the rural population would be at a heightened risk of misinformation
due to lower educational standards and the economic struggles which accompany rural
life. In 2008, World Bank concluded
that Bihar had one of the highest incidence of poverty compared to the other
states of India, with 40% of its population living below the poverty line,
while the national average was 29%.11 With increasing incidence of
diabetes, Bihar is at a heightened risk of developing secondary complications
of diabetes due to the positive correlation between poverty, education, and
awareness.
Glaucoma
In our study, an overwhelming 60.3% of participants did not know about
glaucoma. This is a significant proportion, and further highlights the need for
outreach programs focused on patient education. Despite advanced surgical
techniques that aim at controlling IOP, blindness caused by glaucoma continues
to be a growing trend worldwide, especially in India.12 One of the challenges in
management of glaucoma is that symptoms do not present until the late stages of
the disease. The majority of the developing world has
limited access to routine eye exams, and consequently, these are the people at
high risk of developing late stage symptoms and subsequent irreversible
blindness. The association between a lack of awareness of glaucoma and late
clinical presentation of the disease has been highlighted in studies around the
world. The Barbados Eye Study (BES) found that of participants with primary
open angle glaucoma, 51% were unaware of the term or nature of the disease.13
More specific to India is the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study (APEDS), which
showed that awareness of glaucoma was very limited in rural populations in
Southern India.14 Our research suggests that educational outreach
regarding glaucoma would benefit the communities of Patna, Bihar, India.
Cataract
Our study data indicates an encouraging level of awareness for cataracts
and treatment methods. These results reflect positively on existing efforts to
increase cataract awareness in Patna. Information about cataracts is being
relayed effectively from doctor to patient, and patient to family and friends.
Because of high participant awareness of cataracts and treatment, future
educational outreaches should be focused on different areas of ocular health,
such as diabetes-related vision problems and glaucoma.
Conclusion
Our data suggests that residents
in Patna, Bihar India could benefit from educational outreach programs
specifically addressing prescription eye drop usage and ocular health
complications specific to diabetes and glaucoma. Increasing patient awareness
of prevalent eye diseases and treatments could lead to an increase in patient
acceptance of the importance of routine eye examinations for timely
identification and treatment of many eye conditions. The data reported here will
help eye care professionals and health educators target specific educational
initiatives for the target population.
Acknowledgements
This study was developed in cooperation with Unite For Sight® and the A.
B. Eye Institute, Unite for Sight’s partner clinic in Bihar.
Jennifer Staple-Clark, C.E.O. of Unite for Sight, and Dr. Satyajit Sinha of the
A. B. Eye Institute, offered valuable suggestions to the study design. Special
thanks to Dr. Nick Galli of California State University, Northridge for
valuable mentorship, and Abhishek Mishra of the A. B. Eye Institute for
translation and data collection assistance.
References
1.
Venkata G, Murthy S, Gupta
SK, Bachani D, Jose R, John N. Current estimates of blindness in India. Br J
Ophthalmol. 2005 89:257-260.
2.
Dua AS, Muralikrishnan R, Praveen RK, Thulasiraj
RD, Damodar B, Gupta S, Murthy GVS. Blindness. NCMH Background papers: burden
of disease in India. 2005 299-305.
3.
Gullapalli
NR. Ophthalmology in India. Arch Ophthalmol, 2000 118:1431-1432.
4.
Congdon NG,
Friedman DS, Lietman T, Important cause of visual impairment in the world
today. JAMA. 2003 290(15):2057-2060.
5.
Gupta SK, Murthy GVS. Where do persons with blindness caused by cataracts in rural areas of
India seek treatment and why? Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 113:1337-1340.
6. Dandona R, Dandona L, John RK,
McCarty CA,
Rao GN. Awareness of eye diseases in southern India. Bulletin of the World
Health Organization. 2001 79(2), 96-102.
7.
UNESCO. UIS statistics in
brief: literacy rates [Internet]. 2009. Available from:
http://stats.uis.unesco.org/unesco/TableViewer/document.aspx?ReportId=121&IF_Language=eng&BR_Country=3560
8.
Deshpande M. Vision 2020: Right to sight – India.
MJAFI. 2008 64(4):302-303.
9.
Dua AS, Muralikrishnan R, Praveen RK, Thulasiraj
RD, Damodar B, Gupta S, Murthy GVS. Blindness. NCMH Background papers: burden
of disease in India. 2005 299-305.
11. Boelaert, M., Meheus, F., Sanchez, A., Singh, S. P., Vanlerberghe, V.,
Picado, A., Meessen, B. and Sundar, S. (2009), The poorest of the poor: a
poverty appraisal of households affected by visceral leishmaniasis in Bihar,
India. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 14: 639–644.Hennis A, Wu S, Nemesure B, Honkanen R,
Leske MC. Barbados Eye Studies Group. Awareness of incident open-angle glaucoma
in a population study: The Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology. 2007
114:1816–21.
12. Quigley, H.A., Broman,
A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. British
Journal of Ophthalmology 2006 90:262-267.
13. Hennis A, Wu S, Nemesure B, Honkanen R,
Leske MC. Barbados Eye Studies Group. Awareness of incident open-angle glaucoma
in a population study: The Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology. 2007
114:1816–21.
14. Krishnaiah S, Kovai V, Srinivas M,
Shamanna BR, Rao GN, Thomas R. Awareness of Glaucoma in the rural population of
Southern India. Ind J Ophthalmol. 2005 53:205–8.
15. Brilliant G, Lepkowski J, Zurita B, Thulasiraj R. Social determinants of
cataract surgery utilization in South India. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:584–9
Key words: Preventable blindness,
eye care, educational outreach, Bihar